Resilient design and anti-fragile environment: developing a complementary relationship in the public realm
Keywords:
Resilience, antifragility, public space, coastal flooding, innovative governancePublished
2024-07-14
Issue
Section
TRACK 07: ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Francesca Sartorio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Much has been written on resilience in planning and the built environment and some attempts have been made to define antifragility in our disciplines and theoretically link these two concepts. This paper builds on theories of (dynamic non-equilibrium) resilience to analyse three case studies of adaptation to coastal flooding. It presents a short review of theories, illustrates the cases and their relevance and draws conclusions aimed at providing practical recommendations for the production of antifragile public spaces in our towns and cities. Within this contribution, we understand resilience as the general adaptive capacity of a complex system (with agency, evolutionary and with learning capacity) and antifragility as an inherent characteristic to benefit from instability (stable, non-dynamic, available in 'fixed quantities' from the beginning) belonging to material objects. Both relate to the ability of a community to shape and re-shape its spaces and places to face new challenges. Developing the approach that dynamic non-equilibrium resilience of planning and decision-making systems and antifragility of the built environment could be studied as complementary sides of the same coin (Sartorio et al, 2021), the paper will present initial findings from three case studies in Wales where built environment adaptations took place to enhance community resilience to unexpected natural crises. The cases have been chosen as exemplary of the issues many coastal communities face in the UK but also as they show what is possible, even within tight resource constraints, within a responsive governance environment. It is argued that successful adaptation is the result of both effective adaptive capacity and antifragile environments, well interconnected and bridged through innovative governance arrangements. The focus of the contribution rests on developing methodological and theoretical links between the concepts of resilience and of antifragility in developing space and place through local governance arrangements.References
Berkes, F., J. Colding, and Folke, C. (2003), Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Blecic, I and Cecchini, A (2020), ‘Antifragile planning’, Planning Theory, 19(2):172-192
Sartorio, F.S., Aelbrecht, P., Kamalipour, H. et al. (2021), Towards an antifragile urban form: a research agenda for advancing resilience in the built environment. Urban Design International 26, 135–158
Taleb, N.N., (2012), Anti-fragile. Things that gain from disorder, London: Penguin Books