Keywords:
Climate Adaptation, Mountain Communities, Transition StrategiesPublished
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Andrea Omizzolo, Federica Corrado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
In recent years, mountain communities related with the snow tourism sector has been dealing with various and in some cases highly challenging trends. Above all, climate change effects, especially increasing temperatures and decreasing snow-reliability, have been already observed and are expected to intensify in the future (Marty, 2013). This, accompanied by social and demographic changes, can lead to a potential decrease in the attractiveness of snow tourism destinations (hereinafter STDs) and a consequential weakening of their local economies. Analyses from the ongoing European Alpine Space project 'BeyondSnow' indicate that the most afflicted are potentially the smaller, lower-altitude ones. The cascading effects of the lack of snow and climate change more generally, however, also impact directly or indirectly on the community key infrastructures and on settlements making these communities even more vulnerable. Following the IPCC (2022) definition, vulnerability is defined as “the propensity or predisposition to be adversely affected, a quality shaped by diverse factors, including exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity” recognizing the intricate interplay between environmental shifts and societal dynamics. These dynamics have evident reflections on planning. However, are the actual planning tools and practices for these small alpine mountain areas at low-medium altitude adequate to effectively deal with them? Which planning innovations can contribute making these communities more resilient to climate change and in particular to its effects in the winter tourist season? If “nature-based solutions for adaptation hold huge potential to work right now to buffer the impacts of climate hazards for frontline communities (FEBA, 2017), how do they relate to planning in these contexts? What can be the relationship between planning and ad-hoc local/regional transition strategies reducing the vulnerability of STDs? Starting from the insights of the BeyondSnow project, authors aim at giving a contribution to support planning efforts for community adaptation transition paths towards more resilient scenarios and sustainable development.
References
FEBA. (2017). Making ecosystem-based adaptation effective: A framework for defining qualification criteria and quality standards [(FEBA technical paper developed for UNFCCC-SBSTA 46)]. GIZ. https://www.iied.org/g04167
IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Working Group II Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1a ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844
Marty, C. (2013). Climate change and snow cover in the European Alps (pp. 33–44).
Omizzolo, A., Moroni, A., Corradini, P., & Tonelli, C. (2023). Vulnerability Map of Alpine STDs. Interreg Alpine Space BeyondSnow project, https://www.alpine-space.eu/project/beyondsnow/